Here are the numbers for comparison: 2012 Data in Parentheses
Motor Trend: 4.8 13.5@101 (4.6 13.3@103)
Car and Driver: 4.5 13.2@104 (4.7 13.4@104)
Road and Track: 4.6 13.2@104 (NA)
Insideline: 4.7 13.4@102 (5.1 13.4@101)
Was not sure where to place this information. There are a few threads about the new numbers run by the 2012 SRT8.
That is the information people like to ignore... The Jeep was designed to be much more refined, offer better handling, but maintain similar straight line acceleration. They did what they set out to do. When running the WK1 vs. WK2 stock for stock it was found that they had similar numbers but the WK2 did pull a bit more up top. Even being equal times/speeds SRT did a great job with the platform they were given. The only thing they dropped the ball on is the price.
I doubt anyone seriously in the market for an X5M would bother looking at the WKII either. It's not in the same class of vehicle. See what I did there ?
Couldn't agree more...
Although, I would buy the M.
__________________
2008 Jeep SRT-8 Red Rock 11.80 @ 113 www.youtube.com/BOYCHIKS
2.4 Whipple Supercharged by King Motorsports
Red Ops CF Venom Hood__Super Gloss Black OEM wheels__NT05 275/315__Billet Technology
I doubt anyone seriously in the market for an X5M would bother looking at the WKII either. It's not in the same class of vehicle. See what I did there ?
Sure
Last edited by scrapiron7; 08-11-2011 at 06:06 AM.
The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.