Motor Trend gets a 4.6 0-60 - Cherokee SRT8 Forum

Auto Insurance

Go Back   Cherokee SRT8 Forum > WK2 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 Discussion (2012+) > WK2 SRT8 General Discussion

WK2 SRT8 General Discussion This section is for the general discussion of the second generation Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8

CherokeeSRT8.com is the premier Jeep Cherokee Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-10-2011, 09:07 AM
MXHAULER's Avatar
MXHAULER MXHAULER is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 76
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Motor Trend gets a 4.6 0-60

Some better numbers and a comparison to X5 and Cayenne S


http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...est/index.html


2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8
BASE PRICE $55,295
PRICE AS TESTED $56,600 (est)
VEHICLE LAYOUT Front engine, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door SUV
ENGINE 6.4L/470-hp/465-lb-ft OHV 16-valve V-8
TRANSMISSION 5-speed automatic
CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 5223 lb (55/45%)
WHEELBASE 114.8 in
LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 191.3 x 77.1 x 69.1 in
0-60 MPH 4.6 sec
QUARTER MILE 13.3 sec @ 103.2 mph
BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 106 ft
LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.88 g (avg) (avg)
MT FIGURE EIGHT 25.8 sec @ 0.71 g (avg)
EPA CITY/HWY FUEL ECON 12/18 mpg
ENERGY CONSUMPTION, CITY/HWY 281/187 kW-hrs/100 miles
CO2 EMISSIONS 1.37 lb/mile


Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz1UdfAxfBS
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 08-10-2011, 09:10 AM
scrapiron7's Avatar
scrapiron7 scrapiron7 is offline
Senior Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Dripping Springs, TX
Posts: 921
Thanks: 36
Thanked 77 Times in 55 Posts
Garage
Interesting they'd compared it to the non-performance models. BMW X5 xDrive 35i (Not the X5 M) and Porsche Cayenne S (Not Turbo S).
__________________
2012 Ford Raptor - Oxford White, SCT Tuner, 5-star tuned.
Sold: 2008 Jeep SRT8. Bwoody intake, Diablo Johan tuned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old 08-10-2011, 10:48 AM
Velopod Velopod is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 43
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrapiron7 View Post
Interesting they'd compared it to the non-performance models. BMW X5 xDrive 35i (Not the X5 M) and Porsche Cayenne S (Not Turbo S).
Because they are comparing likely competitors at a given price point - the X5 35i is about the same price and Cayenne S is still almost 10K more. A bit silly to compare to an X5M or Cayenne Turbo that costs almost twice as much. I'm thinking a WKII SRT and a Corvette (or boat) would be a nicer combo than a Cayenne Turbo ;-)

As good a "bargain" as the original JGC SRT8? Of course not, but still a great vehicle by most measuring sticks outside of *this* forum (full of WKI owners).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to Velopod For This Useful Post:
Stephen5242 (08-10-2011)
  #4  
Old 08-10-2011, 12:30 PM
EXTM's Avatar
EXTM EXTM is offline
Supporting Vendor
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Abu Dbabi, UAE
Posts: 422
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Velopod View Post
Because they are comparing likely competitors at a given price point - the X5 35i is about the same price and Cayenne S is still almost 10K more. A bit silly to compare to an X5M or Cayenne Turbo that costs almost twice as much. I'm thinking a WKII SRT and a Corvette (or boat) would be a nicer combo than a Cayenne Turbo ;-)

As good a "bargain" as the original JGC SRT8? Of course not, but still a great vehicle by most measuring sticks outside of *this* forum (full of WKI owners).
well said .......
__________________
06 GC SRT8 Turbo (915AWHP & 1008AWTQ (single turbo 426)
98 GTR R33 (Track Race car)
2010 370Z (Track Race Car)
2010 EVO X (Track Race Car)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5  
Old 08-10-2011, 12:54 PM
quicksilver quicksilver is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 26
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Pretty much what I fig'd, Inside Line test was on the slow side for both since I know what the Cayenne TT can do 1st hand. But I feel MT test is good to show that the WK2 would be a lil slower/same performance wise as the WK1. I know their going by price point but kinda weird to compare it to the xDrive35, one is more performance oriented and the other more of a normal suv. My neighbors xDrive35 get's 25mpg on the highway, incredible considering it has plenty of power and geared so well to that 8 speed auto.

Jeep shot itself in the foot not having the new 8 speed sooner, or even a 6 speed since apparently that 8 speed won't be going to the V8 models but only vehicles (jeep, 300 etc) with the Pentastar 6.

The main thing is it lost what made the wk1 so much fun, sure it's nice having a more refined and nicer driving truck, but the previous Jeep was raw which made it a blast.

Last edited by quicksilver; 08-10-2011 at 12:56 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6  
Old 08-10-2011, 01:21 PM
scrapiron7's Avatar
scrapiron7 scrapiron7 is offline
Senior Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Dripping Springs, TX
Posts: 921
Thanks: 36
Thanked 77 Times in 55 Posts
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Velopod View Post
Because they are comparing likely competitors at a given price point - the X5 35i is about the same price and Cayenne S is still almost 10K more. A bit silly to compare to an X5M or Cayenne Turbo that costs almost twice as much. I'm thinking a WKII SRT and a Corvette (or boat) would be a nicer combo than a Cayenne Turbo ;-)

As good a "bargain" as the original JGC SRT8? Of course not, but still a great vehicle by most measuring sticks outside of *this* forum (full of WKI owners).
If someone is shopping for a 'performance' SUV, they sure as hell won't be looking at the X5 35i. It doesn't compare to the WK2, except in price. It's not the same class of vehicle. They'd be looking at an X5 M.

Last edited by scrapiron7; 08-10-2011 at 01:22 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7  
Old 08-10-2011, 03:24 PM
Wintermute's Avatar
Wintermute Wintermute is offline
Major Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,248
Thanks: 14
Thanked 51 Times in 41 Posts
I doubt anyone seriously in the market for an X5M would bother looking at the WKII either. It's not in the same class of vehicle. See what I did there ?
__________________
2015 Porsche Macan S on order
2012 JGC Overland Deep Cherry
2010 JGC SRT8 Modern Blue
bt c-c, reso-delete, obx L-tubes, bwoody 4", johan/trinity


Last edited by Wintermute; 08-10-2011 at 03:25 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to Wintermute For This Useful Post:
Stephen5242 (08-10-2011)
  #8  
Old 08-10-2011, 03:40 PM
jsd512 jsd512 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Here are the numbers for comparison: 2012 Data in Parentheses

Motor Trend: 4.8 13.5@101 (4.6 13.3@103)

Car and Driver: 4.5 13.2@104 (4.7 13.4@104)

Road and Track: 4.6 13.2@104 (NA)

Insideline: 4.7 13.4@102 (5.1 13.4@101)


Was not sure where to place this information. There are a few threads about the new numbers run by the 2012 SRT8.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9  
Old 08-10-2011, 03:53 PM
Harrison@Stage6 Harrison@Stage6 is offline
Supporting Vendor
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Down South in Florida
Posts: 16,903
Thanks: 1,528
Thanked 2,489 Times in 1,180 Posts
Garage
Anyone know the weight of the Jeeps being tested? Any fully loaded vs. stripped? I wonder how much the roof adds weight wise?


Sent from my Autoguide iPhone app
__________________
Quickest and Fastest AWD Jeep period........ for now.
8.95@156.99 1.46 60'
2012 Mercedes S63-- sittin' low on 22's and stock(kinda)

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10  
Old 08-10-2011, 03:58 PM
Wintermute's Avatar
Wintermute Wintermute is offline
Major Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,248
Thanks: 14
Thanked 51 Times in 41 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrison@Stage6 View Post
Anyone know the weight of the Jeeps being tested? Any fully loaded vs. stripped? I wonder how much the roof adds weight wise?


Sent from my Autoguide iPhone app
MT says 5223 lbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Cherokee SRT8 Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Motor Trend drives 5.0 cmn1 Other Vehicle Makes & Models Discussion 5 04-01-2010 01:02 PM
MXM on Motor Trend Radio championjeep WK1 SRT8 General Discussion 9 01-24-2009 08:05 PM
Jeep #1 Motor trend says so shorestyle031 WK1 SRT8 General Discussion 6 04-05-2008 12:46 PM
motor trend roadtest promo718 WK1 SRT8 General Discussion 4 07-17-2007 05:52 AM
August Motor Trend 08 picture Bang Bang WK1 SRT8 General Discussion 30 07-02-2007 12:00 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:11 AM.



Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
© AutoGuide