So is a turbo the only way to get into the low 11's or 10's??? - Page 11

**Andy** · #1 08-18-2009, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by veyronSRT8

well i think i have to disagree with your opinion of a TT setup. I DO agree that the full potential of the single turbo set up has not yet been reached, however (driveline upgrades aside) once this potential is reached then you still need to think about some kind of lag, no? to me if a TT set up is done correctly then is should yield better results than that of a single turbo set up. surely you can get huge number out of either set up but i beleive the powerband will appear a lil different not to mention track times being a bit different as well (TT coming out on top of course). I am POSITIVE we will see some nasty TT set ups in the near future....aside from the ones already out there running strong and laying down stout number

Agreed 100%. A proper Twin-Turbo setup will spool up faster than a proper Single-Turbo setup 90% of the time.

**Chris@LPM** · #2 08-18-2009, 05:35 AM

I have a TT Jeep and have found out there are several others out there. They used the STS kit for a 300C and modified it to fit the Jeep. I have not seen or heard of any results from those builds.

**Chris@LPM** · #3 08-18-2009, 12:30 PM

Actually a year and a half ago I did make a few passes with a 275 shot of Nos. If you claim your buddy did it. Then ask him what problems he had and what he had to do to get it down the track. This info will help to validate your story.

cjg454ss · #4 08-18-2009, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FLsrt8

Actually a year and a half ago I did make a few passes with a 275 shot of Nos. If you claim your buddy did it. Then ask him what problems he had and what he had to do to get it down the track. This info will help to validate your story.

im just stating what he has ran. he sold the jeep months ago. i dont think he had any problems, he ran a fjo progressive on it and it was setup to launch on the street.

you can dump a ton of money in these things and they will never be fast. unless you think a 1.5 60ft and a high 6 is fast. yea for an suv it is, but for a car its embarassing.

**Chris@LPM** · #5 08-18-2009, 12:55 PM

Pissing match no. I was actually trying to help you. Time to move on.

**Chris@LPM** · #6 08-18-2009, 01:47 PM

454 do you have any vids of your Camero running at the track?

cjg454ss · #7 08-18-2009, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FLsrt8

454 do you have any vids of your Camero running at the track?

http://s23.photobucket.com/albums/b3...Chapter6-4.flv

here is a 10psi pass leaving on no boost. sorry about the response earlier. i misread what you wrote. my fault

**Chris@LPM** · #8 08-18-2009, 02:00 PM

No problem. Just don't let it happen again!!

**Andy** · #9 08-18-2009, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cjg454ss

http://s23.photobucket.com/albums/b3...Chapter6-4.flv

here is a 10psi pass leaving on no boost. sorry about the response earlier. i misread what you wrote. my fault

Definitely a fast car, but you cant claim 125mph in the 1/8 and then post a video of 112mph in the 1/8. I want to see 125mph in the 1/8. Not doubting you, I just want to watch the video.

Blown-WJ · #10 08-18-2009, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cjg454ss

http://s23.photobucket.com/albums/b3...Chapter6-4.flv

here is a 10psi pass leaving on no boost. sorry about the response earlier. i misread what you wrote. my fault

I don't understand what your trying to prove here? Comparing your Camaro to a Jeep? We have guys in 4500lb street trim Challengers running 110+ in the 1/8 and a Magnum wagon trapping 140.