SRT-8 Rear seat leg room, less than a 95 GC? [Archive] - Cherokee SRT8 Forum

: SRT-8 Rear seat leg room, less than a 95 GC?


69mach
06-20-2006, 10:00 AM
Hello guy's new to the fourm.
Been looking at SRT-8's and I have a 95 GC Limited that I drive in the winter. But my wife sat in the back of a 2006 GC SRT-8 and it looked to have less leg room than my 95? Is this correct? Now I'm just wondering if the seat was layed back or something?

radduc
06-20-2006, 08:43 PM
All I know is that I was really disappointed with the rear seat room.If I needed a rear seat I would have not bought the truck because of that.Fortunatly,I don't need it,so foot to the floor!!!!!!!

BigHemi
06-22-2006, 07:03 PM
Hello guy's new to the fourm.
Been looking at SRT-8's and I have a 95 GC Limited that I drive in the winter. But my wife sat in the back of a 2006 GC SRT-8 and it looked to have less leg room than my 95? Is this correct? Now I'm just wondering if the seat was layed back or something?

The front seat must have been way back. This model jeep is longer than the others and gives an extra two inches of leg room in the back

69mach
06-23-2006, 05:07 AM
That’s what I was thinking too, so I went home and ran my seat all the way back and it had more room. So I’m thinking the SRT-8 maybe had the seat laying back too?