Have you guys seen this??
I hope is not a re-post, did a quick search and nothing popped up.
Batman posted this on the other site (SJs), credit goes to him for finding it.
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=13999

ive been hearing it on the radio all day, you beat me to it u started a thread at the same time

It's non-binding and no cash infusion, but should be seen as a positive for survival--assuming they can help "us" build the types of cars consumers want.

ive been hearing it on the radio all day, you beat me to it u started a thread at the same timeNo problem, as long as one of us posted it.

It's non-binding and no cash infusion, but should be seen as a positive for survival--assuming they can help "us" build the types of cars consumers want.Well, this consumer wants a V12 Ferrari motor on a future Jeep SRT8 :D.

[QUOTE=QBNKID;337599]Have you guys seen this??
I hope is not a re-post, did a quick search and nothing popped up.
Batman posted this on the other site (SJs), credit goes to him for finding it.
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=13999[/QUOT

It's a done deal http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE50J4CW20090120



Jack

It's a done deal http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE50J4CW20090120



JackJack, thanks for the link.
Did you notice this on that article?
There goes my wish to have a Ferrari V12 on a Jeep SRT12 :D.
I really hope this move will help Chrysler, time will tell...
Chrysler also said it would be given access to all of Fiat's vehicle platforms, except the Ferrari sports car line.

automatic customer loyalty on a Maserati quattroporte.....nice :)

I tell you one thing though. The u.s. gov't better not throw money at chrysler/cerebrus to stay afloat if a large portion is owned foriegnly/fiat. I'm tired of our taxpayer money being thrown around to everyone but those that need it. :mad: