BWoody Jeep CAI vs GSM:

Just got back from the dyno, and here are the results. We made three pulls with each CAI trying to keep ECT and oil temps as close as possible to each other between runs. SAE correction was used, and we used fourth gear as always.

1) BWoody

Oil: 199F
ECT: 195F

401rwhp/399rwtq

2) BWoody

Oil: 201F
ECT: 190F

401rwhp/400rwtq

3) BWoody

Oil: 204F
ECT: 194F

401rwhp/399rwtq

The 3 pulls with BWoody CAI:


http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r206/Fourcam330/BWoody3.jpg



1) GSM

Oil: 188F
ECT: 190F

388rwhp/387rwtq

2) GSM

Oil: 201F
ECT: 195F

388rwhp/385rwtq

3) GSM

Oil: 204F
ECT: 195F

390rwhp/389rwtq


Three pulls with the GSM CAI:

http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r206/Fourcam330/GSM3.jpg



The All Important Comparison Graph:

http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r206/Fourcam330/BWoodyvsGSM.jpg

I expected the results to be in favor of the BWoody but not by double digits. Even Rob and the other guys at the shop found it rather shocking. Regardless, because of this test and the dozens of other dyno/track tests performed by happy BWoody cusotmers I know which CAI is staying on my ride.
In closing I've said for some time that I knew 400rwhp/tq SAE was entirely possible with a stock longblock N/A 6.1 in a Jeep, and today that finally came to fruition. We don't need no stinking ported heads, in fact, with a little more tweaking from Dave @ B&G and removal of my cats, I don't see why 410rw isn't possible. We'll find out within the next week.

A few more pics of the parts in question:

http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r206/Fourcam330/0001-2.jpg

http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r206/Fourcam330/0002-2.jpg

http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r206/Fourcam330/0003-2.jpg

http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r206/Fourcam330/0004-1.jpg

Its the red that made all the HP-Hooker Red BWoody FTW