#4
·
Sep 10, 2007
LOL - don't ask why just drink bud dry
Welcome to good ole american muscle era - it works suprisingly well despite its "simplicity"
#5
·
Sep 10, 2007
Yeah I guess I did. I mean like even civics have two cams...
I bet labor on engine work on these is cheap, is a cam job like 1000 bucks?
#6
·
Sep 10, 2007
sbkim said:
LOL - don't ask why just drink bud dry
Welcome to good ole american muscle era - it works suprisingly well despite its "simplicity"
Maybe =), I was just watching Top Gear, they reviewed the SRT10 and I thoguht the quote "If you gave the british a 8.1 liter to play with you'd have a whole lot more than 500 break horsepower"
Simple yeah, but it does work well, and the low-end torque is pretty sick too.
#7
·
Sep 11, 2007
between the Hemis and GM's LS motors i think thats enough to proof that single cams are here to stay...
#8
·
Sep 11, 2007
You mean the salesman was lying when he told me the Jeep was quad-cam, like a Ferarri?!
#9
·
Sep 11, 2007
HoustonSRT-8 said:
You mean the salesman was lying when he told me the Jeep was quad-cam, like a
GrandAm ?!
Yep! & it doesn't take 8k rpm to make 420hp either.
#10
·
Sep 12, 2007
But if it had 2 cams, it would make a whole bunch more horsepower at 8k
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.